Facultatea de Stiinte Economice si Administrarea Afacerilor
Str. Teodor Mihali, Nr. 58-60 400591, Cluj Napoca, Romania
Tel: +40.264 41 86 52/3/4/5
Fax: +40.264 41 25 70
|
Scientific committee
The scientific committee is in charge with ensuring the quality of the papers presented at the conference, and as such with the selection of all speakers who will present papers at the conference. Below we give more details on the selection of this body and present its composition for the 2019 edition.
For the 2019 edition, the following 14 academics, affiliated with top foreign universities as well as domestic ones, have agreed to be part of the scientific committee. In alphabetic order, with their current affiliations (as available in January 2019) they are:
- Daniel Andrei, McGill University, Desautels (CA)
- Camelia Bejan, University of Washington-Bothell (US)
- Florin Bilbiie, University of Lausanne (CH)
- Cosmin Ilut, Duke University (US)
- Felicia Ionescu, Federal Reserve Board (US)
- Mihai Manea, Stony Brook Univeristy (US)
- Virgiliu Midrigan, New York University (US)
- Andreea Mitrut, University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Cristian Pop-Eleches, Columbia University (US)
- Zsolt Sandor, Sapientia University-Miercurea Ciuc (RO)
- Irina Stefanescu, Federal Reserve Board (US)
- Razvan Vlahu, De Nederlandsche Bank (NL)
- Marcel Voia, Carleton University (CA) and Université d'Orléans (FR)
- Andrei Zlate, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (US)
NB: All the members of the Scientific Committee are expected to be present at the conference
In order to ensure a high quality of the papers accepted for presentation, a scientific committee with full discretion in the evaluation is a sine qua non. Membership in the scientific committee is conditional on having acquired a high academic standard, as reflected by papers published in top journals in Economics. By "top" here we understand the top 5, plus the next approx. 15-20 journals, according to the scientific hierarchies within the Economics discipline used by most top US and European universities. Moreover, the committee should be cross-field representative, with as many fields as possible represented in its composition, in order to be able to evaluate the submitted papers.
|
|