Reviewing Process
According to the decision of the editorial board, aiming to improve the quality standards, the process of reviewing the articles submitted consists of the following steps:
- articles are sent to the editors to the e-mail mccs@econ.ubbcluj.ro The fulfilment of all requirements is verified according to the author guidelines;
- the editors distribute the manuscripts to specialized national and international reviewers, after having ensured the anonymity of the authors;
- the manuscript is accompanied by the review evaluation form;
- reviewers are required to make the observations and comments in writing on 1-3 pages, which are sent to the editors and submitted back to the authors, to revise the manuscript;
- recommendations aims at one of the four situations: article accepted, accepted with minor changes, accepted with major improvements, and article rejected;
- along with the open feedback on 1-3 pages, reviewers must grade the manuscript according to the criteria set out in the appropriate form.
New Page 2
|
|
Score |
1 |
Structure of the paper |
|
2 |
Quality of the
analysis/methodology |
|
3 |
English quality |
|
4 |
Personal contributions to
knowledge |
|
5 |
Likelihood to stimulate
future research |
|
6 |
Respects the template |
|
7 |
Relevance to MCCS aims |
|
8 |
Overall, the quality of the
paper is |
|
- the review form is transmitted to authors, ensuring the anonymity of the reviewers;
- according to the recommendations received the authors modify the manuscript and submit to the editors.