Prezentare
     Distinctii / Awards
     Departamente
     Cercetare
     Parteneri
     Alumni
     Sustenabilitate
     Oferta educationala
     Studenti
     Admitere
     Examen finalizare studii
     International
     Alegeri academice


Gabriela Bodea,, Clash-ul crizelor sau viclenia lumii asimetrice (Ediția a doua), Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2023
vezi si alte aparitii editoriale

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Contact
Str. Teodor Mihali, Nr. 58-60 400591,
Cluj Napoca, Romania
Tel: +40 264-41.86.55
Fax: +40 264-41.25.70

   
Universitatea Babes-Bolyai | Noutati UBB
FSEGA Online | FSEGA SIS | FSEGA Alumni | Sustenabilitate
Executive Education
Contact | Harta Site | Viziteaza FSEGA

Cho, G., Kim, S., Lee, J., Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C.M. (2023) European Journal of Marketing [Core Economics, Q2]

Autor: Ovidiu Ioan Moisescu

Publicat: 12 Iulie 2023


Cho, G., Kim, S., Lee, J., Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C.M. (2023) A comparative study of the predictive power of component-based approaches to structural equation modeling. European Journal of Marketing, 57(6), 1641-1661.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2020-0542

✓ Publisher: Emerald
✓ Categories: Business
✓ Article Influence Score (AIS): 1.172 (2022) / Q2

Abstract: Generalized structured component analysis (GSCA) and partial least squares path modeling (PLSPM) are two key component-based approaches to structural equation modeling that facilitate the analysis of theoretically established models in terms of both explanation and prediction. This study aims to offer a comparative evaluation of GSCA and PLSPM in a predictive modeling framework. A simulation study compares the predictive performance of GSCA and PLSPM under various simulation conditions and different prediction types of correctly specified and misspecified models. The results suggest that GSCA with reflective composite indicators (GSCAR) is the most versatile approach. For observed prediction, which uses the component scores to generate prediction for the indicators, GSCAR performs slightly better than PLSPM with mode A. For operative prediction, which considers all parameter estimates to generate predictions, both methods perform equally well. GSCA with formative composite indicators and PLSPM with mode B generally lag behind the other methods. Future research may further assess the methods’ prediction precision, considering more experimental factors with a wider range of levels, including more extreme ones. When prediction is the primary study aim, researchers should generally revert to GSCAR, considering its performance for observed and operative prediction together. This research is the first to compare the relative efficacy of GSCA and PLSPM in terms of predictive power.



inapoi la stiri   vezi evenimentele   home


       Copyright © 03-05-2024 FSEGA. Protectia datelor cu caracter personal FSEGA. Protectia datelor cu caracter personal UBB.
       Web Developer  Dr. Daniel Mican   Graphic Design  Mihai-Vlad Guta