Prezentare
     Distinctii / Awards
     Departamente
     Cercetare
     Parteneri
     Alumni
     Sustenabilitate
     Oferta educationala
     Studenti
     Admitere
     Examen finalizare studii
     International
     Alegeri academice


Gabriela Bodea,, Clash-ul crizelor sau viclenia lumii asimetrice (Ediția a doua), Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2023
vezi si alte aparitii editoriale

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Contact
Str. Teodor Mihali, Nr. 58-60 400591,
Cluj Napoca, Romania
Tel: +40 264-41.86.55
Fax: +40 264-41.25.70

   
Universitatea Babes-Bolyai | Noutati UBB
FSEGA Online | FSEGA SIS | FSEGA Alumni | Sustenabilitate
Executive Education | FSEGA Student Job Market
Contact | Harta Site | Viziteaza FSEGA

Hollebeek, L.D.; Sarstedt, M.; Menidjel, C.; Urbonavicius, S. & Dikcius, V. (In press) Marketing Intelligence & Planning [Core Economics, Q2]

Autor: Cristina Alexandrina Stefanescu

Publicat: 18 Noiembrie 2024


Hollebeek, L.D.; Sarstedt, M.; Menidjel, C.; Urbonavicius, S. & Dikcius, V. (In press) Theoretical rigor of customer experience scales: a systematic review and a roadmap for researchers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2024-0413

✓ Publisher: Emerald
✓ Categories: Business
✓ Article Influence Score (AIS): 0.656 (2023) / Q2


Abstract: Prior research has proposed a number of scales measuring the customer experience (CX), which tend to conceptualize and operationalize CX differently, raising potential confusion among researchers (e.g. regarding which scale to use). Addressing this issue, this article conducts a systematic review to inventorize key CX scales and assess their theoretical rigor, with a focus on the identification of potential scale-related drawbacks or risks.
Drawing on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, 104 CX scale development studies published between 1996 and 2024 are identified and analyzed in terms of their respective CX conceptualization, dimensionality, itemization, and adopted theoretical perspective to evaluate their theoretical rigor.
The findings reveal the existence of five main risks associated with the adoption of specific CX or related scales, including (1) defining experience with explicit reference to other extant constructs, (2) failure to accurately and comprehensively capture the experience, (3) experience-based tautology and theoretical indeterminacy, (4) experience-based composite constructs, and (5) lacking robustness of experience-based conceptual models. based on these observations, recommendations are offered for scholars to improve the rigor of their adopted, refined, or proposed CX or related scales. This article assesses the benefits and potential risks inherent in the adoption of particular CX scales, equipping researchers with a CX roadmap.



inapoi la stiri   vezi evenimentele   home


       Copyright © 11-12-2024 FSEGA. Protectia datelor cu caracter personal FSEGA. Protectia datelor cu caracter personal UBB.
       Web Developer  Dr. Daniel Mican   Graphic Design  Mihai-Vlad Guta